Print Page | Contact Us | Sign In | Join NWPCA
Industry Thought Leaders-General Topics
Blog Home All Blogs
Industry experts discuss various topics of interest to the wood packaging industry. Learn what these thought leaders have to say on several issues, and share your comments.


Search all posts for:   


Top tags: pallet  market  industry  lumber  mulch  recycle  renewable  supply  wood  business  Canada  Costco  crating  custom  energy  engineered  environment  fasteners  forestry  global  green  housing  prediction  research  reuse  softwood  technology  tools  upcycle 

Common Myths About Forests And Lumber

Posted By Administration, Monday, November 17, 2014

By Mitchell Kamps, Kamps Pallets 

Companies that rely on products harvested by the lumber industry continually face criticism for perceived bad environmental practices. But do the construction, flooring, and pallet industries contribute to deforestation or the degradation of wooded areas and other ecosystems? carbon cycle Here are two questions we routinely hear about lumbering and the manufacturing of lumber-based products:

Doesn’t lumbering destroy forests and soil?

Forests in the United States are managed entirely differently than they were in the past when clearcutting rebuilt the city of Chicago after its great fire. Instead, Reduced-impact logging, or tree-specific logging, can reduce carbon emissions by up to 30%. As a result, America’s commercial forests are actually growing, even with lumbering and loss to tree diseases or insect predators. We now have more trees in our national landscape than we did at the end of World War II.

Currently forest acreage in the United States numbers 751.2 million acres, but the nation’s privately owned forest reserves are actually more endangered by agricultural or residential development than by clearcutting. On government-owned land, lumber companies pay to replant trees after they are done cutting to ensure a constant replenishment of trees and the continuation of ecosystems. Foresting and protecting biodiversity do not have to be conflicting goals. Lumbering businesses understand that without a continuous supply of trees to harvest, they will be out of business. They are highly incentivized to maintain healthy and productive forests.

Isn’t wood a less environmentally friendly building material than plastic, cement, or brick?

Wood is a renewable resource and requires a limited amount of energy investment to use. In terms of air and water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, it’s the best choice. It weighs significantly less than steel or cement, so it can be transported using less fuel. Processing lumber into furniture, flooring, or pallets does not require complex chemical processes with toxic byproducts. Unwanted wastes created by lumbering and wood-products manufacturing can easily be used for mulch or wood pellets. In fact, wood pallets themselves are made from the unusable trims of milled logs. While plastic products are often useful and can be environmentally friendly, wood products often have a lesser environmental impact.

The supply of wood used by wood-product industries is continually being renewed, and scientists understand better every day how we as a society can leave less of an impact on our lands and forests. Remember: wood is a natural product used by man for thousands of years for any number of purposes. In many ways it’s an ideal material. Frankly we should be using lumber for more purposes in our society, not less.

Tags:  environment  forestry  lumber  renewable  supply  wood 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)